Like living in an undeclared war zone... Police homicides have gone too far in the states and it's not restricted to one state it's a nation wide problem!

On Saturday we heard reports that a 12 year old boy had been shot down by Cleveland police. The police were phoned when a 911 call about a "man" with a gun that was "probably fake". During the call the caller added "i don't know if it's real or not". As we understand it the police officer who shot the boy was not informed by dispatch that the gun could be in fact a "fake" this one mistake led to the death of Tamir Rice. But on the back of the Michael Brown case this along with many other incidents of people having been gunned down by cops shows a clear underlying problem that is not restricted to one state or county. In the states the police do not track how many people have been killed at the hands of the police. The FBI keep track of what they label as "justifiable" police homicides which they report to be in and around 400 per year! This is an under count. The Facebook page 'Killed by police' has been keeping track of police killings. There tally listed more than 1,450 deaths caused by law-enforcement officers since the pages launch on May 1, 2013. That works out at around 3 people dieing per day at the hands of law enforcement. The page doesn’t claim that this is a comprehensive count, but it could be useful — like the count from the FBI’s annual Supplementary Homicide Report is useful — for setting a baseline number of police killings, as long as important caveats are acknowledged. Note: Not all posts are visible on the Killed By Police page because of a Facebook algorithm, Every link can be found in https://docs.google.com/a/fivethirtyeight.com/spreadsheets/d/1WwVDP8anxtQm-6C2g7pjmZkS_jdSomM7UDMonIX0b6k/edit?usp=sharing

The World is Entering a Multi-polar Phase in Global Governance

The moves we are seeing on the international stage by both East and West have in part been driven by the rise of the BRICS nations and the fall of the Petro Dollar system. The sanctions on Russia are not only to do with Ukraine but also the continued growth in BRICS, anyone or anything that rivals the Dollar is an enemy to those who want to keep the status quo. But as we are seeing, the move to a more multi polar world is well underway - both in regards to economics, and actions being taken to oppose Western Hegemony. We have seen the construction of US military bases all over the globe, the disintegration of nation states and the subjugation of nations through economic terror driven by the IMF and  Rothschild owned Central Bank. This is nearly always inflicted on any nation that has had the misfortune of falling into the cross hairs of the US sponsored regime change - one comes after the other it seems, with the continuation of NATO and its shady moves dominated usually by certain countries or country all in the name of spreading ‘Democracy.’ In 2000, there were 7 countries in the world without a Rothschild owned Central Bank: Afghanistan, Cuba, Iraq, Iran, Libya, North Korea and Sudan. In the following three years, we all know what happened, and lo and behold, Afghanistan and Iraq gained said banks. In the next three years Libya and Sudan followed suit. This leaves only Cuba, North Korea, and Iran as the only countries in the world without a Rothschild-owned Central Bank. Interestingly enough, General Wesley Clark describes a memo which he received in the months following 9/11:

'And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.”' - General Wesley Clark.

Putin’s move to stand up against US dominance to step in to protect it’s allies and of course its own interests in Syria was a turning point in the international arena. It was a stand against what has been the norm for decades with certain establishments able to go to war or to create regime change on a whim. The stand from Putin should of course been with Libya which could have saved many thousands of lives and maybe it would have saved Libya from the turmoil it is in now and maybe even stopped the conflict in Syria from escalating. Who knows. What I do know, is that the so called Arab Spring was manufactured by outside players with many different agendas - the people were played like pawns.

China and Russia continued to Veto any moves to topple the Assad regime, while those that wanted to see Syria end up like Libya sat foaming at the mouth furious that realities were changing - the US was not now the sole dominant nation on the international stage. If you think of the globe as a giant chessboard, each player is making moves to contain the other and the pawns each get closer and closer until one has to make a move to decide if they keep or lose their pawn. In Syria, when China and Russia vetoed sanctions and suggestions of intervention, this was the US losing one of their pawns, the game is now in full swing with flash points around the globe: Syria, Ukraine and Iraq being the main stages. People speak about world war 3 but i am content in saying world war 3 may have started a long while ago.

In recent days David Cameron has announced that the UK might go ahead with strikes on ISIS both inside Iraq and Syria, even after Syria warned that strikes on its territory would not be tolerated. This doesn't seem to matter, as Prime Minister Cameron dismissed suggestions that bombing raids in Syria would need permission from Damascus, this would be a blatant breach of international law and a breach of sovereignty, therefore Syria could respond accordingly if they decided to do so.

All of this combined has the potential to be a Cold War 2.0 scenario, and it seems many are thinking in such mentalities from the Mainstream to people in the highest echelons of power. This is a dangerous road we are headed down, old ways of thinking need to be shed before we can move forward as a world, if the NATO expansion towards Russia's borders and the expansion of the US empire into Asia does not cease we could see a very real world war being sparked. This is the last thing we want! We have enough war and strife already, for a very clear world war to kick off would be disastrous for everyone.