The People Are Rising It's About Time The Political Elite Listen...

Back in 2012 spokeswoman for Environment minister Phil Hogan confirmed that over 300,000 households would have fixed water charges, she continued saying up to 90% of households, which can be metered, will be metered by the end of 2014 at a cost of 500m Euros, Of tax payers money. Along with the huge price tag for the installation of these meters Taoiseach Enda Kenny revealed that the expected annual bill for water would be around 240 Euros, with a standing charge of 50 Euros. People have already been paying for these water taxes. We are now seeing nation wide movements of the people against the installation of the water meters along with the charges forced upon them, with daily protests and demonstrations from Cork to Dundalk, along with the sometimes heavy handed tactics of the Garda Siochana and even the workers themselves striking out at protestors. It's encouraging to see that grass roots movements are growing faster than ever before in opposition to Austerity, Bank Bailouts, the wholesale of our nations national resources, it's crucial that people show their anger towards the status quo, turning a blind eye is not an option anymore... The installations have not been going as planned it would seem as workers struggle to install anywhere, everywhere Irish water go the Irish people will be found, in opposition, those in power don't care one bit about the people, those in power see themselves as accountable to no one, this is what will come to bite them as the anger simmers it will get to the point the people will say enough is enough and get rid of these traitors. The people see this charge for a basic human right as a scandal and rightfully so. Tomorrow 11/10/2014 people will gather in Dublin from all over Ireland in what will be one of the largest national demonstrations in decades in opposition to the immoral and unfair taxation of water, if you can get there you should it's time to fight back as a nation...

The rise of a monster from the rubble of war. IS pretext for war in Syria...

People ask where did this group IS come from? When did they spring up? Well for now i can't exactly point to when or where exactly but what i do know IS have grown from the rubble of past invasions occupations and continued support of proxy groups in the region. From the supporting of Mujahid groups in the 80's by the who were fighting against a Soviet occupation of the country, to the backing of so called rebels in Libya who fought against the Gaddafi regime. The continued injection of weapons and support of these groups has evolved to the point in which we find ourselves now, with the likes of IS and Al Qieda affiliated groups coming out on top as the biggest opposition groups in the region, who in recent times have also reportedly joined forces against the anti IS coalition. The strikes have effectively amalgamated these groups. The support of proxies in the middle east has gotten to a point where the monster has become uncontrollable, but not useless! The US back in 2013 were preparing for imminent strikes on Syria after it was alleged that the Syrian regime had used Nuclear weapons on the 21st of August 2013, but as we now know this could not have been further from the truth and was clearly being pushed for a pretext to oust the leadership in Damascus. Propaganda was on overdrive and very nearly pushed us into war, the BBC one of the main perpetrators of this propaganda was caught in the act editing and staging videos that they say was evidence of use of chemical weapons by the regime. See our article 'Media wars, deceptions and lies' Fast forward a year and a half and we have a new pretext that of which being the very same extremist groups the US and allies helped equip and fund for years, we will explain how we have come to this conclusion that the US and allies were indeed behind the creation of IS in a second. Just today 03/10/2014 Joe Biden admitted the U.S allies were the biggest problem in Syria supporting the extremist groups but he stopped short of admitting the U.S. also had a big hand to play in the rise of the extremist groups. For me the most visible signs of this support and funding came when Libya became just another flash point on the world stage, from the outset we had calls echoing from the same camps that called for the unjust invasion of Iraq, calls to strike to support to fund and to arm groups which would fight 'Dictator Gaddafi', and so they did, MI6 and the CIA were training and gun running from the outset, all in preparation for regime change. The covert and overt support for such groups along with air strikes by NATO forces give the 'Rebels' the upper hand, the 'rebels' hoped their advance would spark an uprising in the capital, but the actual number of citizens who chose to join premature democratic celebrations on Green Square was considerably moderate in comparison with the thousands who preferred to stand by the country’s leader in the governmental district of Bab al-Aziziya armed with the handguns distributed among the locals earlier. Without a doubt the intelligence services of certain countries including Israels Mossad had a major hand in the rise of these groups, orchestrating and co-ordinating attacks which led to the subsequent fall of the Libyan Regime. The US and its allies could not be seen as waging a ground war in Libya so Qatar and UAE were only more than willing to help out, the very same establishments that are now supporting extremist groups inside Syria against the Syrian Regime. The fall of the Libyan regime created a platform in which extremist groups like IS and Al Qieda could launch attacks as well as re group and re organize, this is exactly what happened leading up to the 'Revolution' inside Syria, which was shown only to have been supported by a small amount of people in the country. But at the beginning just like in Libya the mass media here in the West sold it to the public as a popular uprising, but as we said from the start this was just another engineered plot for regime change in Syria. In fact the only real support came and still comes from outside players. At the time U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and U.S. military officer, Admiral Mike Mullen acknowledged there was only limited U.S. intelligence on the rebels who might eventually take control of the oil-producing country. These admissions that they knew very little about who they were actually funding and supporting just shows us exactly how unsure the establishments were when it came to arming and training groups to fight in these countries. These grievances have been aired before by many other officials across the board but of course their voices are drowned out by the usual War Hawks with help of the Propaganda machines working over time. Over the last few years accounts from fighters themselves have been documented that they had personally been trained by U.S. military advisers in Jordan and elsewhere within the region, the numbers of which are debated. Move forward a year or 2 and the so called revolution in Syria starts to take off as more and more outside players joined the fight, fighters from all over the world, groups who had once fought against the Libyan regime were now fighting against the Syrian regime, weaponry and equipment used in the Libya conflict had been brought in to Syria and so began a new flash point which would set the stage for what we are now seeing with the rise of the likes of IS. As veteran fighters inside Libya began to move towards Syria plans were underway to arm and train even more fighters in Syria to face the Assad regime, time and time again Russia and China vetoed resolutions that sought to arm rebel opposition sighting that some of these very same groups were involved in terror activity's in Syria. Neither Washington nor the Arab League, which commissioned an Observer Mission to Syria in the first place, have accepted the interim report presented by the AL Mission. Why? Because the Mission --integrated by independent observers from Arab League countries- provides a balanced and objective assessment of what is happening on the ground inside Syria. It does not serve as a mouthpiece for Washington and the governments of Arab states. It points to the existence of an "Armed Entity"; it acknowledges that "armed opposition groups" including the Syria Free Army are involved in criminal and terrorist acts. "In some zones, this armed entity reacted by attacking Syrian security forces and citizens, causing the Government to respond with further violence. In the end, innocent citizens pay the price for those actions with life and limb. "In Homs, Idlib and Hama, the Observer Mission witnessed acts of violence being committed against Government forces and civilians that resulted in several deaths and injuries. Examples of those acts include the bombing of a civilian bus, killing eight persons and injuring others, including women and children, and the bombing of a train carrying diesel oil. In another incident in Homs, a police bus was blown up, killing two police officers. A fuel pipeline and some small bridges were also bombed. " "Such incidents include the bombing of buildings, trains carrying fuel, vehicles carrying diesel oil and explosions targeting the police, members of the media and fuel pipelines. Some of those attacks have been carried out by the Free Syrian Army and some by other armed opposition groups." When Obama and Co mention supporting 'Moderate' fighters they are inadvertently arming such groups as IS, Biden himself said there was no middle ground when it came to these fighters, along with the continued propaganda war being waged by IS and the MSM it is a cocktail for disaster, or is it? Well if your ultimate outcome was regime change in the first place then it does not look so illogical but the fact the MSM aren't reporting it as such does not mean it is not so... just watch as targets move from IS to the SAA and the regime. "NATO is already clandestinely engaged in the Syrian conflict, with Turkey taking the lead as U.S. proxy. Ankara’s foreign minister, Ahmet Davitoglu, has openly admitted that his country is prepared to invade as soon as there is agreement among the Western allies to do so. The intervention would be based on humanitarian principles, to defend the civilian population based on the “responsibility to protect” doctrine that was invoked to justify Libya. Turkish sources suggest that intervention would start with creation of a buffer zone along the Turkish-Syrian border and then be expanded. Aleppo, Syria’s largest and most cosmopolitan city, would be the crown jewel targeted by liberation forces. I will refer back to the leaked call between Foreign Minister Ahmet Davudoğlu Head of Turkish Intelligence MIT Hakan Fidan Undersecretary of Foreign Ministry Feridun Sinirlioğlu General Yaşar Güler, this call shines a light on the murky behind the scenes preparations and intentions for an invasion of Syria and ultimately regime change. Now you see that the rise to prominence of these groups has been down to direct interference and incitement from Western and Arab states, with the back up of NATO another long arm of the war machine. It may be confusing so I'll put it like this, NATO/US/Israel/Saudi and ISIL are indeed 2 sides of the same coin. Evidence is building by the day proving all what we have been saying to be true. Stop supporting terror in the Middle East! End the Wars!

Strikes in Syria and Iraq have helped bolster the IS ranks, at the same time having little to no effect in stopping IS fighters

As the days drag on strikes continue but with minimal effect on IS, so far they have failed to stop IS or even slow the movements of their fighters, smaller Islamic groups operating in Syria and Iraq that have been put on the terror list and target lists recently have threw their lot in with ISIS bolstering their ranks, indeed France's defense council even met to decide if they should reverse the decision to strike IS because of this. Reasons why the strikes are so minimal in effect may be coming to light, The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights on Monday described what had happened over night "The overnight bombings hit mills and grain storage facilities in Manbij, a militant-held town in northern Syria. Coalition forces possibly mistook the structures for Islamic State holdings" It is yet to be seen if this is a reoccurring theme but if so this would back up claims that the US aren't in fact going after IS but look to tackle the Syrian Government instead, using IS as a pretext. The powers that be know rightly these strikes are being used for recruiting purposes, many have joined the ranks of IS since the beginning of these strikes, because to a lot of Muslims and none Muslim's these strikes are seen as they should be, as another crusade by the west and it's allies in the Middle East. Disenfranchised young Muslims across the globe are becoming more and more radical in their stance against these crusades in turn some even go to these war zones to fight. Now once enemy's Al-Nusra Front and IS have reportedly joined forces against the anti IS coalition, in an audio message leader of the Al-Nusra group said "The West Will Pay The Heaviest Price" for its actions in Iraq and Syria, these strikes without a doubt have give the Islamic groups a cause to rally around. Mission creep has happened over and over with Afghanistan , Iraq etc, we are told this campaign will stretch years not months, the likely hood of feet on the ground becomes greater by the day. A huge media campaign was launched still pushing for broader strikes in Syria, in time i believe this may include Syrian Regime targets. Just like in Iraq we will see that all of this was indeed a mistake to go in and bomb all around the place, not just because it's the innocent people feeling the brunt but because all these strikes have done is bolster the ranks of IS with more fighters and boosted its support around the world, the same thing the establishments were working to try and stop.

'Media wars- Deceptions and lies '

 First published Apr-26-2014

 In today's world of media wars, information wars fought on TV airwaves across the globe and across the internet,
we find people truly trying to dissect information sorting the wheat from the chaff to find what is truly going on and then we have those who spout the narratives of mainstream media outlets such as the BBC,CNN and Fox without ever going beyond that narrative to find other sources to give oneself a better understanding of any given situation around the world and there is any number of those situations to choose from.

For some of us it's clear what's going on in the world of Media, Western Establishments namely the US have had a major monopoly on it for at least the last 2 to 3 decades and the narratives those media outlets use and have used,, rarely do we get really good investigative journalism from those within these major mainstream newspapers and broadcasters but when we do they never touch on anything of any real significance tho if it's a staged chemical attack like seen in Syria then BBC will gladly lend a hand, even editing the videos to suit the western establishments narratives as pointed out by RTs Daniel Bushel, Published on Mar 23, 2014 by The Truthseeker (RT)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diyZt.

No.... they(MainstreamMedia) think the populace deserves a diluted down one slanted version of what they think is going on, half truths and down right lies at best,, i will use Syria and Libya as an example here, for nearly a year and a half we had William Hague, David Cameron and the rest of his cohorts cheering on support for Jihadi militants from all over the globe fighting in Syria as well as Libya during the conflict there,
fast forward to today most people now realize that those same mercenaries fighting in Syria and who fought in Libya are foreign backed fighters with no intentions of creating a better anything, only but to destroy the fabric of Syrian and Libyan society like a cancer spread across a once beautiful lands, this scenario has played out on the screens of billions of tvs and computer screens across the globe many times before, the last decade alone has seen the fall of the Saddam Regime during the war in Iraq, the war in Afghanistan, CIA backed coup attempt that took place in Venuzeuala, and in more recent times the war in Syria and the toppling of the Libyan government which seen ethnic cleansing of black African migrants who "rebels" at the time claimed were apart of Colonel Gaddafis forces, in reality most had nothing to do with the conflict but were murdered anyway, many articles have been published about these atrocities.

These are but a few examples of the media deceptions and one sided narratives that come from mainstream media outlets, they plaster their own narratives over the TV screens and networks, and the sad thing is a good percentage of people among us are willing to take it all as fact and run with it without stepping back and asking why? Maybe it's just too much to ask from people? It really get's me down when i think about it.

Back to the topic tho, calls for intervention in Libya came thick and fast by the usual war hawks Hague, Mccain, Kerry, Rice etc etc leading up to the 19th of March 2011, the day NATO sent the multi state forces to carpet bomb a sovereign country and sovereign people. Anywhere up to and around 60,000 Libyans died as a result of NATO's "humanitarian" interventions, the country's infrastructure was destroyed and that of which has not yet happened in Syria the destruction of the Social fabric of the country.

The mainstream coverage of the ongoing conflict was unprecedented in scale as was the propaganda being pushed by these media news outlets, an example of which was Al Jazeera's obvious staged celebrations in Green square on the 17 of August ( http://stopwarcrimes.wordpress.com/2011/08/22/al-jazeeras-fake-green-square/ ) 4 days before the actual incident took place, BBC,CNN,SKY all ran with this story, we can even go back to April 2003 the staged toppling of Saddam's statue, which Robert Fisk called "the most staged photo opportunity since Iwo Jima"

We are very well aware of who funds Russia today and its network but in my opinion they do some of the finest journalism i have seen from a mainstream outlet these past few years, but now we even have the likes of John Kerry laying his teeth into RT going as far as to say "RT is Putins bullhorn" for propaganda coming out of Moscow, in reality John Kerry is a hypocrite so far detached from the truth and realities of the situation he might as well be on his way to mars, along with the embarrassing press conferences the US state department use to push their own usually very warped narrative's of situations, like Ukraine, we had a number of US diplomats along with EU politicians openly calling for revolution on the streets of Kiev, is this not against international law? What other country would let this happen?

Videos the likes of "I am Ukrainian" which was uploaded on Youtube, Showing a young good looking(To sell the message) woman standing at a barricade in Maidan Square telling us the line that Maidan protesters were peaceful protesters just looking for change, that was all, but it was clear to the world as time went on the protesters were anything but "peaceful" or that they were just looking for change, not to long after its release we also learned that those behind the video were not as righteous as first thought, it happened to be that those behind it had links to shadowy US NGO's who have been known to be directly involved in staging phony "colour revolutions" in the past.

"Changes in the policies of external actors…a major shift in US policies toward the promotion of human rights and democracy in other countries…". American international NGOs ("Ingos") were prominent mechanisms through which this causal link between superpower foreign policy interests and regime change worked out in many transitions from authoritarian rule in the twenty-one-year-long "third wave". The principal argument is that the main and direct causes of the colour revolutions were and still are United States foreign-policy interests (strategic expansion, energy security and the war on terrorism) as they are serviced by Ingos. Without the intervention of these US-sponsored Ingos, the political landscapes in countries like Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan would not have been repainted in new colours like the US desired.

"…power does its work by stealth, and the powerful can subsequently deny that their strength was ever used at all."

Salman Rushdie, Shalimar the Clown (2005)

In the world of global politics and world affairs a name stands out 'George Soros' a billionaire and self proclaimed activist who has been known to be involved in the large scale funding of nongovernmental organizations inside Ukraine also Libya, Right Sector being among those groups, an Ultra nationalist far right group who were involved in some of the worst violence that took place in Kiev and now in the East of Ukraine, with the murder of 5 self defense militia members near the eastern city of Slaviansk.These the same mix of organizations who call for more democracy and revolutions outright within Ukraine, the same organizations who call for closer ties to the European Union. Soros is quoted as saying

“The EU, along with the International Monetary Fund, is putting together a multi-billion dollar rescue package to save the country from financial collapse,” he wrote in a piece for Project Syndicate.

“But that will not be sufficient to sustain the national unity that Ukraine will need in the coming years. … Ukraine will need outside assistance that only the EU can provide: management expertise and access to markets.”

This mans agenda is clear to see, for anyone who can grasp modern Geo politics, he wants to see the IMF & World bank putting a strangle hold on Ukraine as it has done with many a country before, Libya being one of those country's, in fact the week of the intervention Libya seen thee establishment of an IMF bank were there had not been before. Soro's buddies in the world banks and IMF will surely give him a pat on the back for his dastardly deeds over this last decade alone.

The fact that these so called News outlets continue to spread half truths , lies and continue to shy away from the perpetraters of these illegal wars and interventions sets a precedent for us as members of the human race to stand up and be counted, it is up to us to bring the facts to tell our friends to tell our community's it is us who will bring change it is us who help fight the information war, it's not just information it's life or death for many people this is why we do what we do in the hopes that some will listen and take note of the changing times we are living in, the veil has been lifted half way it is about time we stripped the veil away totally and showed the world order as it stands today for what it really is, a stain on humanity, balance is once again needed, the peoples of the world are fed up with constant war's constant lies more are calling for change by the day, be the change you want to see in the world.

Trial by media continues as BBC's Panorama judges Putin himself is to blame for everything happening in Ukraine...

 BBC 2 aired a Panorama show about the crises in Ukraine on the 12th of Sept, firstly the people behind the show from the outset had already made a clear decision who they thought was behind the crises and who the main perpetrators were in downing MH17, implying Putin himself maybe to blame for the downing of the plane.

The Boeing 777 exploded while traveling from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, killing all 298 people on board including 193 Dutch citizens..  .

The BBC presenter then went on to claim unverified footage and a single still picture of a BUK system  was clear evidence of Russian involvement in Ukraine pictured supposedly 10 miles away from the crash site without any clear markings or insignia to show who they were or in fact where they were.

 As we know at the time Ukraine BUK systems were active in the area! Yes that’s right Ukraine admitted this after being pushed on the.downing of Malaysian airlines. But as we will discover the plane was not taken out by a BUK system at all well that’s what the  evidence is starting to indicate.

A  Dutch report released a few days ago said that the plane was hit by many high velocity rounds which riddled the plane, if true this would back up the claims by residents of the surrounding areas that they seen military jets guiding the passenger plane before it was downed which i mentioned in our last article about the tragedy  of MH17, and the claims by Moscow that the plane had been taken down by Ukrainian military jets.

Investigators came to their findings based on information from the aircraft's black boxes, and pictures and video taken at the scene, as well as information supplied by Ukrainian air traffic control.

The presenter of the BBC Panarama program then went on with the same narrative of Kiev that the humanitarian convoy which was held up at the Russia Ukraine border because it was in fact a ‘Trojan Horse’ tactic by Russia, all of which was proven to have been lies after the convoy itself was inspected by the worlds media showing nothing but the aid  that was being sent in to Ukraine for the people.

These glaring facts did not stop the presenter continue to imply things without any real evidence backing up his claims as pointed out above, the ‘evidence’ he did show us was a few unverified pieces of footage and pictures of what looks like a BUK system without clear insignia and then again showing footage of what they say was a Russian Armour ed convoy on the side of a road, again with no insignia to prove this to be the case nothing to say it was indeed a Russian convoy or even Ukrainian.

 This is just another kink in the propaganda war between what is being defined by the day as East and West. The west MSM which has shown itself to have a clear agenda of the demonetization of Russia and Putin in general,  is nothing but smoke and mirrors for actions being taken by other establishments inside Ukraine, look over there while i do my dirt over here...

Of course people have real grievances with Russia and Putin but the propaganda campaign launched by certain MSM outlets has taken it to a whole new level the likes which not seen since world war 2, but the facts of the situations have shown time and time before these very same MSM outlets to have been untruthful and at times downright deceitful, while backing one side and demonizing the other this being Russia and or any other establishment or person standing up to the powers that be. See our article ‘Media Wars-’ for a more detailed look at the MSMs past fabrications and lies, link below…


http://www.liveleak.com/view?b=ec2_1398563353

The World is Entering a Multi-polar Phase in Global Governance

The moves we are seeing on the international stage by both East and West have in part been driven by the rise of the BRICS nations and the fall of the Petro Dollar system. The sanctions on Russia are not only to do with Ukraine but also the continued growth in BRICS, anyone or anything that rivals the Dollar is an enemy to those who want to keep the status quo. But as we are seeing, the move to a more multi polar world is well underway - both in regards to economics, and actions being taken to oppose Western Hegemony. We have seen the construction of US military bases all over the globe, the disintegration of nation states and the subjugation of nations through economic terror driven by the IMF and  Rothschild owned Central Bank. This is nearly always inflicted on any nation that has had the misfortune of falling into the cross hairs of the US sponsored regime change - one comes after the other it seems, with the continuation of NATO and its shady moves dominated usually by certain countries or country all in the name of spreading ‘Democracy.’ In 2000, there were 7 countries in the world without a Rothschild owned Central Bank: Afghanistan, Cuba, Iraq, Iran, Libya, North Korea and Sudan. In the following three years, we all know what happened, and lo and behold, Afghanistan and Iraq gained said banks. In the next three years Libya and Sudan followed suit. This leaves only Cuba, North Korea, and Iran as the only countries in the world without a Rothschild-owned Central Bank. Interestingly enough, General Wesley Clark describes a memo which he received in the months following 9/11:

'And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.”' - General Wesley Clark.

Putin’s move to stand up against US dominance to step in to protect it’s allies and of course its own interests in Syria was a turning point in the international arena. It was a stand against what has been the norm for decades with certain establishments able to go to war or to create regime change on a whim. The stand from Putin should of course been with Libya which could have saved many thousands of lives and maybe it would have saved Libya from the turmoil it is in now and maybe even stopped the conflict in Syria from escalating. Who knows. What I do know, is that the so called Arab Spring was manufactured by outside players with many different agendas - the people were played like pawns.

China and Russia continued to Veto any moves to topple the Assad regime, while those that wanted to see Syria end up like Libya sat foaming at the mouth furious that realities were changing - the US was not now the sole dominant nation on the international stage. If you think of the globe as a giant chessboard, each player is making moves to contain the other and the pawns each get closer and closer until one has to make a move to decide if they keep or lose their pawn. In Syria, when China and Russia vetoed sanctions and suggestions of intervention, this was the US losing one of their pawns, the game is now in full swing with flash points around the globe: Syria, Ukraine and Iraq being the main stages. People speak about world war 3 but i am content in saying world war 3 may have started a long while ago.

In recent days David Cameron has announced that the UK might go ahead with strikes on ISIS both inside Iraq and Syria, even after Syria warned that strikes on its territory would not be tolerated. This doesn't seem to matter, as Prime Minister Cameron dismissed suggestions that bombing raids in Syria would need permission from Damascus, this would be a blatant breach of international law and a breach of sovereignty, therefore Syria could respond accordingly if they decided to do so.

All of this combined has the potential to be a Cold War 2.0 scenario, and it seems many are thinking in such mentalities from the Mainstream to people in the highest echelons of power. This is a dangerous road we are headed down, old ways of thinking need to be shed before we can move forward as a world, if the NATO expansion towards Russia's borders and the expansion of the US empire into Asia does not cease we could see a very real world war being sparked. This is the last thing we want! We have enough war and strife already, for a very clear world war to kick off would be disastrous for everyone.